An attempt to conduct a fundamental analysis of Nordic American Offshore Ltd. (NAO) requires a crucial starting point: the company's status. The ticker symbol NAO is effectively obsolete, as the company underwent significant corporate changes and a name change, fundamentally altering its public identity and business scope.
The company formerly known as Nordic American Offshore Ltd. (NAO) changed its name to Hermitage Offshore Services Ltd. (PSV) in June 2019 after a new ownership group, led by the Scorpio Group, took control. Subsequently, Hermitage Offshore Services Ltd. filed for bankruptcy (Chapter 11) in August 2020 due to the prolonged downturn in the offshore oil and gas industry. The company's vessels were sold, and the stock was delisted.
Therefore, this article provides a retrospective fundamental analysis of NAO/PSV focusing on the factors that led to its ultimate failure and the inherent risks of the Offshore Support Vessel (OSV) sector.
 |
| fundamental analysis of Nordic American Offshore Ltd. (NAO) |
Retrospective Fundamental Analysis of Nordic American Offshore Ltd. (NAO / PSV)
I. Business Overview and Industry Context
Nordic American Offshore Ltd. (NAO) was established in 2013 as a spin-off of Nordic American Tankers (NAT), focused on the Offshore Support Vessel (OSV) market, primarily operating Platform Supply Vessels (PSVs) in the North Sea (UK and Norwegian sectors).
Core Business: PSVs are specialized ships used to transport supplies, equipment, and personnel to and from offshore oil and gas drilling rigs and production platforms.
Initial Strategy: NAO, following the model of its parent NAT, intended to pursue an accretive growth strategy based on high equity capitalization and a full dividend payout model, which would appeal to income-focused investors.
Fleet: As of late 2017, the company operated a fleet of 10 PSVs.
The fundamental weakness of NAO's business lay in its complete dependence on the highly cyclical and volatile offshore oil and gas industry.
II. Qualitative Analysis: Sectoral Headwinds
The single most critical factor in NAO's eventual collapse was the severe, prolonged downturn in the oil and gas sector that began in late 2014 and intensified thereafter.
A. The Oil Price Collapse
A fundamental analysis must acknowledge the macro environment:
Decreased Drilling: The sharp decline in crude oil prices (starting in 2014) caused oil majors to drastically cut their capital expenditure on exploration and production (E&P), particularly in expensive deepwater areas like the North Sea.
Supply Glut in OSV Market: The period preceding the downturn saw significant new vessel construction, leading to a massive oversupply of PSVs and other OSVs when demand evaporated.
Day Rate Collapse: The combination of low demand and high supply led to a collapse in charter day rates (the daily fee earned by the vessel). NAO's effective day rates often fell below cash break-even levels.
B. High Operational and Capital Costs
Operating in the North Sea is notoriously expensive due to stringent safety regulations, weather challenges, and high crew wages.
Lay-Up Costs: As market conditions worsened, NAO had to place several vessels in "warm lay-up" (temporarily out of service but maintained for quick re-entry), which reduced operational costs but still incurred significant expenses without generating revenue.
Asset Depreciation: The value of offshore vessels plummeted, leading to massive non-cash impairments and reducing the company's Book Value.
III. Quantitative Analysis: Financial Distress
The company's financial results reflected the devastating industry conditions, moving from potential profitability to sustained losses.
A. Revenue and Day Rate Performance
The most telling sign of fundamental weakness was the trend in revenue and utilization rates:
Effective Day Rates: In the competitive environment, even a relatively high utilization rate (percentage of days chartered) couldn't offset the low day rate. For example, in Q1 2019, the average effective day rate for its PSVs was around $6,481 per available day, which was insufficient to cover its total costs, including debt service.
Revenue Decline: The combination of low rates and lay-ups resulted in consistently declining and volatile quarterly revenues, pushing the company into a continuous operational loss.
B. Profitability Metrics
NAO's profitability was defined by persistent negative earnings.
Net Income (Loss): The company reported massive net losses over several years (e.g., Annual Income of approximately -$197.3 million in 2018), driven by poor operating performance and non-cash asset impairment charges reflecting the diminished value of its fleet.
Negative EPS: Correspondingly, Earnings Per Share (EPS) was deeply negative (e.g., TTM EPS of -$29.74 around 2019 due to major impairments, or a more operational negative EPS of -$4.53 in late 2018, before the 2019 name change).
C. Balance Sheet and Solvency
The structure of its balance sheet was key to its fate.
Debt-to-Equity: The company maintained a high Debt-to-Equity (D/E) Ratio (e.g.,
in late 2017), indicating a heavy reliance on debt financing. While this is typical in the capital-intensive shipping industry, high leverage is fatal in a prolonged downturn when cash flows dry up.
Book Value: Despite the high debt, the Book Value per share was volatile but generally declining, reflecting the write-down of its vessels.
Liquidity: The Current Ratio (Current Assets/Current Liabilities) often showed a seemingly healthy level (e.g.,
IV. The Final Phase and Delisting
The corporate actions in the final years signaled extreme distress:
Scorpio Takeover (2018): The company underwent a change in management and ownership in late 2018, with the Scorpio Group injecting fresh equity at a distressed price of $0.42 per share. This move was an attempt to restructure and recapitalize the company.
Name Change to Hermitage Offshore Services (2019): NAO changed its name and ticker to PSV to signal a fresh start under the new management and a broader scope beyond the North Sea, acquiring additional vessels (AHTS and crew boats).
Chapter 11 Bankruptcy (2020): Ultimately, the persistent low day rates in the OSV sector proved too much. Despite recapitalization and management changes, the accumulated debt load could not be sustained. Hermitage Offshore Services Ltd. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in August 2020, leading to the liquidation of its assets and the permanent delisting of the stock (PSV / NAO).
V. Conclusion for Fundamental Investors
A fundamental analysis of Nordic American Offshore (NAO) serves as a textbook cautionary tale in investing in highly leveraged, capital-intensive businesses subject to extreme cyclicality.
For a fundamental investor, the warning signs were:
Undue Reliance on a Single Volatile Commodity (Oil).
Unsustainable Debt Burden when cash flow generation turned negative.
Industry-Wide Supply Overhang that kept day rates depressed for years.
The company's failure illustrates that strong qualitative analysis of the industry cycle and a conservative view of leverage are paramount in the offshore shipping sector, overriding temporary improvements in quantitative metrics.
0 comments:
Post a Comment