The Pillars of Global Order: Understanding the Sources of International Law
worldreview1989 - The framework of International Law (IL) is unique, operating without a global legislature or a mandatory enforcement body. Consequently, identifying where its binding rules originate—its sources—is fundamental to understanding its legitimacy and application. The universally accepted touchstone for these sources is found in Article 38(1) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice (ICJ).
 |
| The Pillars of Global Order: Understanding the Sources of International Law |
While the Statute was originally drafted for the Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ) in 1920 and adopted for the ICJ in 1945, Article 38 remains the authoritative guide for the Court's function in deciding disputes submitted to it in accordance with International Law.
Article 38(1) of the ICJ Statute: The Canonical List
Article 38(1) is widely regarded as the most complete statement on the sources of International Law. It directs the Court to apply the following in order to resolve international disputes:
a. international conventions, whether general or particular, establishing rules expressly recognized by the contesting states;
1 b. international custom, as evidence of a general practice accepted as law;
2 c. the general principles of law recognized by civ
3 ilized nations;d. subject to the provisions of Article 59, judicial decisions and the teachings of the most highly qualified publicists of the various nations, as subsidiary means for the determination of rules of law.
The sources listed in sub-paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) are considered the primary sources, while those in sub-paragraph (d) are subsidiary sources (tools for interpreting the law, not creators of new law).
1. International Conventions (Treaties)
Treaties, also known as international conventions, pacts, or agreements, are the most tangible and deliberately created source of international law. They are essentially written agreements by which states formally and voluntarily consent to create legal rights and obligations among themselves.
General vs. Particular: Treaties can be general (multilateral), establishing widespread rules applicable to the international community (often referred to as 'law-making treaties,' such as the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties), or particular (bilateral or regional), which function more like contracts between a few states.
Consent is Key: The principle of pacta sunt servanda ("agreements must be kept") underscores treaty law. A state is only bound by a treaty if it has explicitly consented to it, usually through signature and ratification.
2. International Custom
Customary International Law (CIL) arises from the consistent and widespread practice of states which they follow out of a sense of legal obligation. It is often described as 'unwritten law' and is critical for binding even states that have not explicitly agreed to a specific treaty. CIL has two essential elements:
State Practice (usus): This requires a general, consistent, and uniform practice by states over a period of time. It includes actions, statements by government representatives, official publications, and diplomatic correspondence.
A Sense of Legal Obligation (opinio juris): States must follow the practice because they believe they are legally bound to do so, not merely out of comity, courtesy, or political expediency. This psychological element differentiates CIL from mere habit.
3. General Principles of Law
These principles serve as a gap-filling mechanism in cases where treaties and custom offer no clear rule. They are fundamental legal concepts and maxims common to the major legal systems of the world's nations. The inclusion of this source ensures the Court can avoid a declaration of non liquet (that is, an inability to decide a case due to a lack of applicable law).
Examples include:
The principle of good faith (bona fides).
The principle that a party to a dispute cannot be the judge in its own case (nemo judex in causa sua).
The principle of estoppel (preclusion from contradicting a previous position).
The principle of reparation for injury caused.
Subsidiary Means: Judicial Decisions and Teachings
Sub-paragraph (d) explicitly refers to these two elements as subsidiary means for the determination of rules of law. They are not sources that create law themselves, but rather tools that assist the Court in identifying and interpreting the existence and scope of rules derived from the primary sources (treaties, custom, and general principles).
1. Judicial Decisions
This includes decisions of the ICJ itself, as well as those of other international tribunals (such as the International Criminal Court, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, and arbitration panels) and, at times, national courts.
No Stare Decisis: Unlike common law systems, the ICJ does not strictly follow the doctrine of stare decisis (precedent), meaning its past decisions are not legally binding on future cases. Article 59 of the ICJ Statute explicitly states that the Court’s decision "has no binding force except between the parties and in respect of that particular case."
Weight of Authority: Nevertheless, ICJ judgments and advisory opinions carry enormous weight and are highly persuasive evidence of what the law is, frequently cited and relied upon by states and other international bodies.
2. Teachings of Publicists
This refers to the writings of the "most highly qualified publicists" (distinguished scholars, jurists, and academics) on International Law. Historically, these writings held great sway, especially in the early development of IL. Today, while their direct influence has diminished due to the rise of treaties and international institutions, scholarly works still play a vital role in:
Systematizing and clarifying complex legal rules.
Identifying emerging trends in state practice.
Providing a critical and comprehensive analysis of the existing law.
Hierarchy and Modern Developments
While Article 38(1) is generally cited in the order (a) to (c), it does not establish a strict hierarchy among the three primary sources (Treaties, Custom, General Principles). In practice, if a dispute is governed by a treaty to which both states are parties, the Court will typically look to the treaty first. If the treaty is silent, a rule of Customary International Law may apply.
Furthermore, two key concepts now supplement the interpretation of the sources listed in Article 38:
Jus Cogens (Peremptory Norms): These are fundamental principles of International Law that are accepted and recognized by the international community of states as a whole as a norm from which no derogation is permitted. Examples include the prohibition of genocide, slavery, and torture. A treaty that conflicts with a jus cogens norm is void.
Unilateral Declarations: Certain binding legal acts, such as resolutions of the UN Security Council (under Chapter VII of the UN Charter) or formal declarations by states, can create obligations for states, even though they are not explicitly listed in Article 38.