Fundamental Analysis of General Growth Properties (GGP)

---

A Case Study in Retail REITs: Fundamental Analysis of General Growth Properties (GGP)

General Growth Properties (GGP), once the second-largest owner and operator of U.S. shopping malls, is a significant case study in the dynamics of the retail real estate sector, particularly for investors interested in Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). While GGP stock ceased to trade publicly following its acquisition by Brookfield Property Partners (BPY) in 2018, its history offers invaluable lessons in property value, financial engineering, and resilience in the face of market disruption.

Fundamental Analysis of General Growth Properties (GGP)

The Core Value Proposition: Portfolio Quality

The fundamental strength of GGP was rooted in the quality and location of its physical assets. Unlike many of its peers, GGP focused on owning and managing what are known as Class A regional malls.

Irreplaceable Assets and High Productivity

GGP’s portfolio included flagship properties in prime locations, such as Ala Moana Center in Honolulu and Tysons Galleria in Virginia. This focus meant:

• High Barrier to Entry: It's nearly impossible to build new Class A malls in similar dense, affluent markets, which protects GGP's existing assets from competition.

• Superior Tenant Sales: These malls commanded premium rents because they consistently generated higher sales per square foot for retailers compared to lower-tier malls.

• Adaptability: The best properties proved more resilient to the "Retail Apocalypse" and the rise of e-commerce, offering better opportunities for redevelopment and repurposing former anchor stores (like converting them into entertainment venues, residential space, or non-traditional retail).

Key REIT Fundamental Metrics (Pre-Acquisition Focus)

For a REIT like GGP, traditional corporate metrics like Net Income or EPS are less relevant than specialized real estate measurements. A fundamental analysis focused on its operations before the 2018 acquisition would highlight:

1. Funds From Operations (FFO)

FFO is the widely accepted cash flow proxy for REITs. It adjusts Net Income by adding back depreciation and amortization, which are non-cash expenses, and subtracting gains from property sales.

• GGP’s Trend: Post-2009 bankruptcy reorganization (a major event detailed below), GGP focused intently on growing its FFO per share. This growth was driven by increasing occupancy rates, rolling over leases at higher rates, and strategic redevelopments. Strong FFO growth indicated its operations were successfully generating cash for shareholders and supporting its dividend.

2. Net Asset Value (NAV)

Net Asset Value (NAV) represents the theoretical value of all a REIT's assets minus all its liabilities, essentially an estimated liquidation value. For GGP, NAV often served as a critical point of contention:

• Valuation Gap: Many analysts consistently estimated GGP's NAV per share to be significantly higher than its public stock price (pre-acquisition). This "NAV gap" was a key argument for investors, suggesting the stock was undervalued and that a private buyer could unlock substantial hidden value by acquiring the company. Brookfield's eventual successful bid aimed to close this gap.

3. Balance Sheet and Debt Management

A look at GGP's balance sheet reveals its tumultuous history and subsequent structural strength:

• The 2009 Bankruptcy: GGP filed for the largest real estate bankruptcy in U.S. history after taking on excessive debt, particularly through its 2004 acquisition of The Rouse Company. This event underscored the inherent risk of high leverage in the cyclical real estate industry.

• Post-Bankruptcy Restructuring: The company emerged with a much cleaner, more conservative balance sheet, and a focus on non-recourse mortgage debt on individual properties. This approach shielded the corporate entity from widespread default and was a huge positive for fundamental analysts post-2010.

---

The Acquisition: GGP's Final Fundamental Outcome

The ultimate chapter in GGP's stock history came with its acquisition by Brookfield Property Partners (BPY), its largest shareholder. The deal, completed in August 2018, valued GGP at roughly $15 billion and confirmed the underlying value of its assets.

Acquisition Details and Shareholder Payout

The final offer was highly structured, allowing GGP shareholders to elect to receive one of three forms of consideration for each GGP share:

1. Cash ($23.50 per share)

2. BPY units (shares in Brookfield Property Partners)

3. Shares in a newly created U.S. REIT (Brookfield Property REIT, BPR)

This mixed offering provided GGP investors with certainty of value (the cash option) and the opportunity for continued growth (the equity options), confirming the premium value of the company's irreplaceable mall portfolio.

Investor Takeaways from the GGP Case Study

The GGP story provides critical lessons for fundamental investors analyzing the retail and broader REIT sectors:

1. Asset Quality is Paramount: The post-2009 recovery and high acquisition price were largely due to GGP's focus on Class A malls. In retail real estate, the best assets prove to be a better long-term bet than the rest.

2. REIT Debt Matters: The bankruptcy serves as a stark warning about the dangers of over-leveraging, even for a company with great properties. Prudent debt management is a non-negotiable factor in REIT analysis.

3. The NAV Gap as a Catalyst: When a stock trades consistently below its estimated Net Asset Value, it often signals the potential for a buyout or corporate action to unlock that value. GGP's high NAV relative to its stock price made it an attractive target for Brookfield.

In conclusion, General Growth Properties' journey from historical bankruptcy to a major, value-unlocking acquisition demonstrates the importance of a rigorous fundamental analysis focusing on the health of the balance sheet, cash flow (FFO), and the intrinsic value of its real estate portfolio (NAV) within an evolving retail landscape.